Command R7 B vs Qwen 3.8 27 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-28 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Command R7 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.066 per million tokens versus
$0.342, a 81% difference.
Qwen 3.8 27 B offers the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Command R7 B.
Head to head
| Command R7 B | Qwen 3.8 27 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.037 | $0.039 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.150 | $1.25 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.066 | $0.342 |
| Context window | 128,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Vendor | cohere | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Command R7 B | Qwen 3.8 27 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.075 | $0.351 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $0.750 | $3.52 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $7.50 | $35.15 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.8 27 B when you need the longer context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Pick Command R7 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.