Qwen 3 VL vs Qwen 3 VL 235 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-27 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 VL 235 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.482 per million tokens versus
$0.482, a 0% difference.
Both offer the same 262,144-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 VL | Qwen 3 VL 235 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.260 | $0.260 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.15 | $1.15 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.482 | $0.482 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | inferenceapis | inferenceapis |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 VL | Qwen 3 VL 235 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.547 | $0.547 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $5.47 | $5.47 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $54.75 | $54.75 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Qwen 3 VL 235 B unless you are already standardised on inferenceapis tooling and want to avoid a second integration.