Qwen 3 Coder Next vs Hermes 3 70 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-28 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Hermes 3 70 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.165 per million tokens versus
$0.290, a 43% difference.
Qwen 3 Coder Next offers the larger context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Hermes 3 70 B.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 Coder Next | Hermes 3 70 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.120 | $0.120 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.800 | $0.300 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.290 | $0.165 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | qwen | lambda_ai |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 Coder Next | Hermes 3 70 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.320 | $0.195 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $3.20 | $1.95 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $32.00 | $19.50 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3 Coder Next when you need the longer context window (262,144 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick Hermes 3 70 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.