Mimo V2.6 Pro vs Qwen 3.6 27 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-28 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Mimo V2.6 Pro is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.544 per million tokens versus
$1.01, a 46% difference.
Mimo V2.6 Pro offers the larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen 3.6 27 B.
Head to head
| Mimo V2.6 Pro | Qwen 3.6 27 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.435 | $0.450 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.870 | $2.70 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.544 | $1.01 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | xiaomi | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Mimo V2.6 Pro | Qwen 3.6 27 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.652 | $1.12 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $6.53 | $11.25 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $65.25 | $112 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Mimo V2.6 Pro when you need the longer context window (1,050,000 vs 262,144 tokens). Pick Mimo V2.6 Pro when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.