DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Fast Fp 4 vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 7 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-28 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 2.5 Coder 7 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.015 per million tokens versus
$0.307, a 95% difference.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Fast Fp 4 offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 32,768 for Qwen 2.5 Coder 7 B.
Head to head
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Fast Fp 4 | Qwen 2.5 Coder 7 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.010 | $0.010 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.20 | $0.030 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.307 | $0.015 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 32,768 |
| Vendor | coralbricks | nebius |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Fast Fp 4 | Qwen 2.5 Coder 7 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.310 | $0.018 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $3.10 | $0.175 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $31.00 | $1.75 |
Which should you pick?
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Fast Fp 4 when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 32,768 tokens). Pick Qwen 2.5 Coder 7 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.