DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM 4.6: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-30 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: GLM 4.6 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.875 per million tokens versus
$0.912, a 4% difference.
GLM 4.6 offers the larger context window at 204,800 tokens, against 163,840 for DeepSeek R1 0528.
Head to head
| DeepSeek R1 0528 | GLM 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.500 | $0.500 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $2.15 | $2.00 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.912 | $0.875 |
| Context window | 163,840 | 204,800 |
| Vendor | deepseek | z-ai |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | DeepSeek R1 0528 | GLM 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $1.04 | $1.00 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $10.38 | $10.00 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $104 | $100 |
Which should you pick?
Pick GLM 4.6 when you need the longer context window (204,800 vs 163,840 tokens). Pick GLM 4.6 when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.