Codestral Latest vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-29 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Codestral Latest is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.450 per million tokens versus
$0.525, a 14% difference.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 128,000 for Codestral Latest.
Head to head
| Codestral Latest | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.300 | $0.300 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.900 | $1.20 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.450 | $0.525 |
| Context window | 128,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Vendor | mistral | mistral |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Codestral Latest | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.525 | $0.600 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $5.25 | $6.00 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $52.50 | $60.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 128,000 tokens). Pick Codestral Latest when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.