Mimo V2.6 Flash vs Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-28 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Mimo V2.6 Flash is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.175 per million tokens versus
$0.355, a 51% difference.
Mimo V2.6 Flash offers the larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B.
Head to head
| Mimo V2.6 Flash | Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.140 | $0.140 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.280 | $1.00 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.175 | $0.355 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | xiaomi | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Mimo V2.6 Flash | Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.210 | $0.390 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.10 | $3.90 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $21.00 | $39.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Mimo V2.6 Flash when you need the longer context window (1,050,000 vs 262,144 tokens). Pick Mimo V2.6 Flash when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.