GLM 5.3 vs Qwen 3 32 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-30 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 32 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.130 per million tokens versus
$0.960, a 86% difference.
GLM 5.3 offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen 3 32 B.
Head to head
| GLM 5.3 | Qwen 3 32 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.080 | $0.080 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $3.60 | $0.280 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.960 | $0.130 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | z-ai | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | GLM 5.3 | Qwen 3 32 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.980 | $0.150 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $9.80 | $1.50 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $98.00 | $15.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick GLM 5.3 when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick Qwen 3 32 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.