Llama 3.2 11 B Vision Instruct vs Lfm 2.5 24 B A2 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-14 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Llama 3.2 11 B Vision Instruct is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.205 per million tokens versus
$0.212, a 3% difference.
Both offer the same 128,000-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Llama 3.2 11 B Vision Instruct | Lfm 2.5 24 B A2 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.049 | $0.050 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.676 | $0.700 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.205 | $0.212 |
| Context window | 128,000 | 128,000 |
| Vendor | cloudflare | liquid |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Llama 3.2 11 B Vision Instruct | Lfm 2.5 24 B A2 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.217 | $0.225 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.17 | $2.25 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $21.75 | $22.50 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Llama 3.2 11 B Vision Instruct unless you are already standardised on liquid tooling and want to avoid a second integration.