Qwen Coder vs Gemma 4 12 B It: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-27 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen Coder is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.600 per million tokens versus
$0.725, a 17% difference.
Qwen Coder offers the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 16,384 for Gemma 4 12 B It.
Head to head
| Qwen Coder | Gemma 4 12 B It | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.300 | $0.300 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.50 | $2.00 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.600 | $0.725 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 16,384 |
| Vendor | dashscope | sail |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen Coder | Gemma 4 12 B It |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.675 | $0.800 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $6.75 | $8.00 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $67.50 | $80.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen Coder when you need the longer context window (1,000,000 vs 16,384 tokens). Pick Qwen Coder when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.