DeepSeek Chat vs Qwen 3.6 27 B Fp 8: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-07 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: DeepSeek Chat is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.463 per million tokens versus
$1.04, a 56% difference.
Qwen 3.6 27 B Fp 8 offers the larger context window at 262,144 tokens, against 163,840 for DeepSeek Chat.
Head to head
| DeepSeek Chat | Qwen 3.6 27 B Fp 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.320 | $0.320 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.890 | $3.20 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.463 | $1.04 |
| Context window | 163,840 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | deepseek | tensormesh |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | DeepSeek Chat | Qwen 3.6 27 B Fp 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.542 | $1.12 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $5.42 | $11.20 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $54.25 | $112 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.6 27 B Fp 8 when you need the longer context window (262,144 vs 163,840 tokens). Pick DeepSeek Chat when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.