DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Llama Guard 3.8 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-27 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Llama Guard 3.8 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.030 per million tokens versus
$0.265, a 89% difference.
DeepSeek Flash Latest offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama Guard 3.8 B.
Head to head
| DeepSeek Flash Latest | Llama Guard 3.8 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.020 | $0.020 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.060 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.265 | $0.030 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 128,000 |
| Vendor | ~deepseek | nebius |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | DeepSeek Flash Latest | Llama Guard 3.8 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.270 | $0.035 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.70 | $0.350 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $27.00 | $3.50 |
Which should you pick?
Pick DeepSeek Flash Latest when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 128,000 tokens). Pick Llama Guard 3.8 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.