DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Llama 3.2.3 B Instruct: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-14 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.089 per million tokens versus
$0.122, a 27% difference.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Llama 3.2.3 B Instruct.
Head to head
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Llama 3.2.3 B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.051 | $0.051 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.203 | $0.335 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.089 | $0.122 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | deepseek | meta-llama |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Llama 3.2.3 B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.101 | $0.135 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $1.01 | $1.35 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $10.14 | $13.46 |
Which should you pick?
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.