Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-07 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.090 per million tokens versus
$0.158, a 43% difference.
Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B offers the larger context window at 258,048 tokens, against 131,072 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.
Head to head
| Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B | Ling 3.0 Flash VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.057 | $0.060 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.459 | $0.180 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.158 | $0.090 |
| Context window | 258,048 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | empiriolabs | inclusionai |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B | Ling 3.0 Flash VL |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.172 | $0.105 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $1.72 | $1.05 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $17.18 | $10.50 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B when you need the longer context window (258,048 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.