Qwen 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek Chat: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-06 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: DeepSeek Chat is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.450 per million tokens versus
$0.562, a 20% difference.
Qwen 3.6 Flash offers the larger context window at 983,616 tokens, against 163,840 for DeepSeek Chat.
Head to head
| Qwen 3.6 Flash | DeepSeek Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.250 | $0.257 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.50 | $1.03 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.562 | $0.450 |
| Context window | 983,616 | 163,840 |
| Vendor | empiriolabs | deepseek |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3.6 Flash | DeepSeek Chat |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.625 | $0.515 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $6.25 | $5.15 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $62.50 | $51.46 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.6 Flash when you need the longer context window (983,616 vs 163,840 tokens). Pick DeepSeek Chat when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.