Qwen 3.8 27 B vs Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Fp 8: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-05 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3.8 27 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.253 per million tokens versus
$0.400, a 37% difference.
Qwen 3.8 27 B offers the larger context window at 262,144 tokens, against 32,768 for Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Fp 8.
Head to head
| Qwen 3.8 27 B | Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Fp 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.170 | $0.170 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.500 | $1.09 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.253 | $0.400 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 32,768 |
| Vendor | empiriolabs | gmi |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3.8 27 B | Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Fp 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.295 | $0.443 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.95 | $4.42 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $29.50 | $44.25 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.8 27 B when you need the longer context window (262,144 vs 32,768 tokens). Pick Qwen 3.8 27 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.