Gemini Gemma 2.9 B It vs Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Thinking 2507 Fp 8: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-05 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Gemini Gemma 2.9 B It is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.525 per million tokens versus
$1.31, a 60% difference.
Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Thinking 2507 Fp 8 offers the larger context window at 262,141 tokens, against 8,192 for Gemini Gemma 2.9 B It.
Head to head
| Gemini Gemma 2.9 B It | Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Thinking 2507 Fp 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.350 | $0.350 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.05 | $4.20 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.525 | $1.31 |
| Context window | 8,192 | 262,141 |
| Vendor | gemini | gmi |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Gemini Gemma 2.9 B It | Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Thinking 2507 Fp 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.613 | $1.40 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $6.12 | $14.00 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $61.25 | $140 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Thinking 2507 Fp 8 when you need the longer context window (262,141 vs 8,192 tokens). Pick Gemini Gemma 2.9 B It when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.