Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120 B A12 B Bf 16 vs Au Anthropic Claude Haiku 5.5: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-07 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120 B A12 B Bf 16 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.200 per million tokens versus
$0.220, a 9% difference.
Au Anthropic Claude Haiku 5.5 offers the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120 B A12 B Bf 16.
Head to head
| Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120 B A12 B Bf 16 | Au Anthropic Claude Haiku 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.110 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.500 | $0.550 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.200 | $0.220 |
| Context window | 32,768 | 1,000,000 |
| Vendor | gmi | au.anthropic.claude |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120 B A12 B Bf 16 | Au Anthropic Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.225 | $0.247 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.25 | $2.48 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $22.50 | $24.75 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Au Anthropic Claude Haiku 5.5 when you need the longer context window (1,000,000 vs 32,768 tokens). Pick Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120 B A12 B Bf 16 when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.