Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Instruct 2507 Fp 8 vs Qwen 3 Next 80 B A3 B Instruct: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-06 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Instruct 2507 Fp 8 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.153 per million tokens versus
$0.343, a 55% difference.
Both offer the same 262,144-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Instruct 2507 Fp 8 | Qwen 3 Next 80 B A3 B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.087 | $0.090 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.350 | $1.10 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.153 | $0.343 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | gmi | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Instruct 2507 Fp 8 | Qwen 3 Next 80 B A3 B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.175 | $0.365 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $1.75 | $3.65 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $17.50 | $36.50 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Qwen 3 235 B A22 B Instruct 2507 Fp 8 unless you are already standardised on qwen tooling and want to avoid a second integration.