Ling 3.2 Flash vs Ernie 5.5 Flash Preview: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-14 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Ernie 5.5 Flash Preview is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — Free per million tokens versus
Free, a 0% difference.
Ling 3.2 Flash offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,024,000 for Ernie 5.5 Flash Preview.
Head to head
| Ling 3.2 Flash | Ernie 5.5 Flash Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | Free | Free |
| Output, per 1M tokens | Free | Free |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | Free | Free |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 1,024,000 |
| Vendor | inclusionai | baidu |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Ling 3.2 Flash | Ernie 5.5 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | Free | Free |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | Free | Free |
| 100M in / 25M out | Free | Free |
Which should you pick?
Pick Ling 3.2 Flash when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 1,024,000 tokens). Pick Ernie 5.5 Flash Preview when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.