Midm K3.0 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-14 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.200 per million tokens versus
$0.350, a 43% difference.
Midm K3.0 Pro offers the larger context window at 261,795 tokens, against 131,072 for Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety.
Head to head
| Midm K3.0 Pro | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.200 | $0.200 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.800 | $0.200 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.350 | $0.200 |
| Context window | 261,795 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | kt | nvidia |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Midm K3.0 Pro | Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.400 | $0.250 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $4.00 | $2.50 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $40.00 | $25.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Midm K3.0 Pro when you need the longer context window (261,795 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.