Qwen 25 Coder 32 B Instruct vs Qwen 3 32 B Fp 8: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-27 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 32 B Fp 8 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.062 per million tokens versus
$0.062, a 0% difference.
Both offer the same 131,072-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Qwen 25 Coder 32 B Instruct | Qwen 3 32 B Fp 8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.050 | $0.050 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.062 | $0.062 |
| Context window | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | lambda_ai | lambda_ai |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 25 Coder 32 B Instruct | Qwen 3 32 B Fp 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.075 | $0.075 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $0.750 | $0.750 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $7.50 | $7.50 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Qwen 3 32 B Fp 8 unless you are already standardised on lambda_ai tooling and want to avoid a second integration.