Lfm 2.5 24 B A2 B vs Claude Haiku 5.5: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-27 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.100 per million tokens versus
$0.212, a 53% difference.
Claude Haiku 5.5 offers the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Lfm 2.5 24 B A2 B.
Head to head
| Lfm 2.5 24 B A2 B | Claude Haiku 5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.050 | $0.050 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.700 | $0.250 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.212 | $0.100 |
| Context window | 128,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Vendor | liquid | anthropic |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Lfm 2.5 24 B A2 B | Claude Haiku 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.225 | $0.113 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.25 | $1.12 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $22.50 | $11.25 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 when you need the longer context window (1,000,000 vs 128,000 tokens). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.