Muse Ember 1.0 vs Voxtral Small 2507: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-11 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Voxtral Small 2507 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.175 per million tokens versus
$0.200, a 12% difference.
Muse Ember 1.0 offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Small 2507.
Head to head
| Muse Ember 1.0 | Voxtral Small 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.500 | $0.400 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.200 | $0.175 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 32,768 |
| Vendor | meta | mistral |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Muse Ember 1.0 | Voxtral Small 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.225 | $0.200 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.25 | $2.00 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $22.50 | $20.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Muse Ember 1.0 when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 32,768 tokens). Pick Voxtral Small 2507 when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.