Muse Ember vs Ripple 65 B Preview: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-14 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Ripple 65 B Preview is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.150 per million tokens versus
$0.200, a 25% difference.
Both offer the same 1,048,576-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Muse Ember | Ripple 65 B Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.500 | $0.300 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.200 | $0.150 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Vendor | meta | ricursiveai |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Muse Ember | Ripple 65 B Preview |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.225 | $0.175 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.25 | $1.75 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $22.50 | $17.50 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Ripple 65 B Preview unless you are already standardised on meta tooling and want to avoid a second integration.