Mistral Nemo vs Qwen 3.5 Flash Variant 1: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-06 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Mistral Nemo is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.029 per million tokens versus
$0.093, a 69% difference.
Qwen 3.5 Flash Variant 1 offers the larger context window at 995,904 tokens, against 131,072 for Mistral Nemo.
Head to head
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen 3.5 Flash Variant 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.029 | $0.029 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.030 | $0.287 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.029 | $0.093 |
| Context window | 131,072 | 995,904 |
| Vendor | mistralai | empiriolabs |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Mistral Nemo | Qwen 3.5 Flash Variant 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.036 | $0.101 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $0.365 | $1.01 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $3.65 | $10.07 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.5 Flash Variant 1 when you need the longer context window (995,904 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick Mistral Nemo when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.