Qwen 3 14 B vs Qwen 3 30 B A3 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-28 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 14 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.150 per million tokens versus
$0.215, a 30% difference.
Both offer the same 40,960-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 14 B | Qwen 3 30 B A3 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.120 | $0.120 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.240 | $0.500 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.150 | $0.215 |
| Context window | 40,960 | 40,960 |
| Vendor | qwen | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 14 B | Qwen 3 30 B A3 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.180 | $0.245 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $1.80 | $2.45 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $18.00 | $24.50 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Qwen 3 14 B unless you are already standardised on qwen tooling and want to avoid a second integration.