Qwen 3 30 B A3 B vs Qwen 3 Coder Next: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-28 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 30 B A3 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.215 per million tokens versus
$0.290, a 26% difference.
Qwen 3 Coder Next offers the larger context window at 262,144 tokens, against 40,960 for Qwen 3 30 B A3 B.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 30 B A3 B | Qwen 3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.120 | $0.120 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.500 | $0.800 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.215 | $0.290 |
| Context window | 40,960 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | qwen | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 30 B A3 B | Qwen 3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.245 | $0.320 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.45 | $3.20 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $24.50 | $32.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3 Coder Next when you need the longer context window (262,144 vs 40,960 tokens). Pick Qwen 3 30 B A3 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.