Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B vs Qwen 3 235 B A22 B2507: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-05 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 235 B A22 B2507 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.305 per million tokens versus
$0.355, a 14% difference.
Both offer the same 262,144-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B | Qwen 3 235 B A22 B2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.140 | $0.140 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.00 | $0.800 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.355 | $0.305 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | qwen | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3.5 35 B A3 B | Qwen 3 235 B A22 B2507 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.390 | $0.340 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $3.90 | $3.40 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $39.00 | $34.00 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Qwen 3 235 B A22 B2507 unless you are already standardised on qwen tooling and want to avoid a second integration.