Qwen 3.6 27 B vs DeepSeek Chat: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-08 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: DeepSeek Chat is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.463 per million tokens versus
$1.04, a 56% difference.
Qwen 3.6 27 B offers the larger context window at 262,144 tokens, against 163,840 for DeepSeek Chat.
Head to head
| Qwen 3.6 27 B | DeepSeek Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.320 | $0.320 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $3.20 | $0.890 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $1.04 | $0.463 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 163,840 |
| Vendor | qwen | deepseek |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3.6 27 B | DeepSeek Chat |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $1.12 | $0.542 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $11.20 | $5.42 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $112 | $54.25 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.6 27 B when you need the longer context window (262,144 vs 163,840 tokens). Pick DeepSeek Chat when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.