Qwen 3.6 35 B A3 B vs Qwen 3 14 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-11 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 14 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.130 per million tokens versus
$0.300, a 57% difference.
Qwen 3.6 35 B A3 B offers the larger context window at 262,144 tokens, against 40,960 for Qwen 3 14 B.
Head to head
| Qwen 3.6 35 B A3 B | Qwen 3 14 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.900 | $0.220 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.300 | $0.130 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 40,960 |
| Vendor | qwen | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3.6 35 B A3 B | Qwen 3 14 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.325 | $0.155 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $3.25 | $1.55 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $32.50 | $15.50 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3.6 35 B A3 B when you need the longer context window (262,144 vs 40,960 tokens). Pick Qwen 3 14 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.