Qwen 3 Coder Flash vs Llama 3.3 70 B Instruct: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-05 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Llama 3.3 70 B Instruct is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.280 per million tokens versus
$0.390, a 28% difference.
Qwen 3 Coder Flash offers the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Llama 3.3 70 B Instruct.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 Coder Flash | Llama 3.3 70 B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.195 | $0.200 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.975 | $0.520 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.390 | $0.280 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | qwen | meta-llama |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 Coder Flash | Llama 3.3 70 B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.439 | $0.330 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $4.39 | $3.30 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $43.88 | $33.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen 3 Coder Flash when you need the longer context window (1,000,000 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick Llama 3.3 70 B Instruct when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.