Qwen 3 Coder Flash vs Ripple 65 B Preview: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-06 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Ripple 65 B Preview is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.300 per million tokens versus
$0.390, a 23% difference.
Ripple 65 B Preview offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen 3 Coder Flash.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 Coder Flash | Ripple 65 B Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.195 | $0.200 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.975 | $0.600 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.390 | $0.300 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Vendor | qwen | ricursiveai |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 Coder Flash | Ripple 65 B Preview |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.439 | $0.350 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $4.39 | $3.50 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $43.88 | $35.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Ripple 65 B Preview when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 1,000,000 tokens). Pick Ripple 65 B Preview when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.