Qwen 3 Next 80 B A3 B Instruct vs Qwen 3 30 B A3 B Instruct 2507: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-03 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 30 B A3 B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.150 per million tokens versus
$0.350, a 57% difference.
Both offer the same 262,144-token context window, so cost is the deciding factor.
Head to head
| Qwen 3 Next 80 B A3 B Instruct | Qwen 3 30 B A3 B Instruct 2507 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.10 | $0.300 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.350 | $0.150 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | qwen | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Qwen 3 Next 80 B A3 B Instruct | Qwen 3 30 B A3 B Instruct 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.375 | $0.175 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $3.75 | $1.75 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $37.50 | $17.50 |
Which should you pick?
Because the context windows are identical, the cheaper option is the better default. Choose Qwen 3 30 B A3 B Instruct 2507 unless you are already standardised on qwen tooling and want to avoid a second integration.