DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 260910 vs Qwen 3 Coder 30 B A3 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-30 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3 Coder 30 B A3 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.375 per million tokens versus
$0.525, a 29% difference.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 260910 offers the larger context window at 1,048,568 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen 3 Coder 30 B A3 B.
Head to head
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 260910 | Qwen 3 Coder 30 B A3 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.300 | $0.300 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.20 | $0.600 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.525 | $0.375 |
| Context window | 1,048,568 | 131,072 |
| Vendor | streamlake | pinstripes |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 260910 | Qwen 3 Coder 30 B A3 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.600 | $0.450 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $6.00 | $4.50 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $60.00 | $45.00 |
Which should you pick?
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 260910 when you need the longer context window (1,048,568 vs 131,072 tokens). Pick Qwen 3 Coder 30 B A3 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.