Hy Mt 2 1.8 B vs Ling 3.1 Flash: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-07 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.068 per million tokens versus
$0.077, a 13% difference.
Ling 3.1 Flash offers the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 8,192 for Hy Mt 2 1.8 B.
Head to head
| Hy Mt 2 1.8 B | Ling 3.1 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.044 | $0.045 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.177 | $0.135 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.077 | $0.068 |
| Context window | 8,192 | 1,000,000 |
| Vendor | tencent | inclusionai |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Hy Mt 2 1.8 B | Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.088 | $0.079 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $0.882 | $0.787 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $8.82 | $7.88 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Ling 3.1 Flash when you need the longer context window (1,000,000 vs 8,192 tokens). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.