Hy 3 vs Llama 3.3 70 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-10-31 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Llama 3.3 70 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.209 per million tokens versus
$0.231, a 9% difference.
Hy 3 offers the larger context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama 3.3 70 B.
Head to head
| Hy 3 | Llama 3.3 70 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.132 | $0.135 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.528 | $0.432 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.231 | $0.209 |
| Context window | 262,144 | 128,000 |
| Vendor | tencent | kyma |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Hy 3 | Llama 3.3 70 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.264 | $0.243 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $2.64 | $2.43 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $26.40 | $24.30 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Hy 3 when you need the longer context window (262,144 vs 128,000 tokens). Pick Llama 3.3 70 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.