Remm Slerp L2 13 B vs Qwen Coder: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-11 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Remm Slerp L2 13 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.350 per million tokens versus
$0.600, a 42% difference.
Qwen Coder offers the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 6,144 for Remm Slerp L2 13 B.
Head to head
| Remm Slerp L2 13 B | Qwen Coder | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.300 | $0.300 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.500 | $1.50 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.350 | $0.600 |
| Context window | 6,144 | 1,000,000 |
| Vendor | undi95 | dashscope |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | Remm Slerp L2 13 B | Qwen Coder |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.425 | $0.675 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $4.25 | $6.75 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $42.50 | $67.50 |
Which should you pick?
Pick Qwen Coder when you need the longer context window (1,000,000 vs 6,144 tokens). Pick Remm Slerp L2 13 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.