GLM 5.3 vs Qwen 3.5.9 B: cost comparison
Prices updated 2026-11-12 · computed from live provider data
Short answer: Qwen 3.5.9 B is cheaper on a
3:1 input/output blend — $0.078 per million tokens versus
$0.402, a 81% difference.
GLM 5.3 offers the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen 3.5.9 B.
Head to head
| GLM 5.3 | Qwen 3.5.9 B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.070 | $0.070 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $1.40 | $0.103 |
| Blended 3:1, per 1M | $0.402 | $0.078 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Vendor | z-ai | qwen |
Monthly cost at real volumes
| Workload (input / output) | GLM 5.3 | Qwen 3.5.9 B |
|---|---|---|
| 1M in / 250K out | $0.420 | $0.096 |
| 10M in / 2.5M out | $4.20 | $0.958 |
| 100M in / 25M out | $41.99 | $9.57 |
Which should you pick?
Pick GLM 5.3 when you need the longer context window (1,048,576 vs 262,144 tokens). Pick Qwen 3.5.9 B when price per token dominates your workload — high-volume classification, extraction, or batch summarisation.